Namibian Mining News The Professional Mining Journal
Related Articles
Namibia’s uranium development pipeline is showing a widening divide between projects advancing towards construction and those still grappling with funding uncertainty, after Deep Yellow postponed a final investment decision (FID) on Tumas while Bannerman Resources secured a major financing package for Etango. Deep Yellow announced on 16 October 2026 that it had withdrawn its target of reaching an FID on Tumas in the fourth quarter of 2026, citing unfavourable equity-market conditions. The company did not provide a revised date, leaving the project’s development timetable uncertain even as preparatory work continues.
The delay comes against a backdrop of rising capital requirements and pressure on Deep Yellow’s market valuation. Tumas’ estimated capital cost increased from US$360 million in December 2023 to US$474 million in April 2025. The project’s economic assessment used a uranium price assumption of US$82.50 per pound and estimated a post-tax net present value of US$577 million, with an internal rate of return of 19%. Cameco’s reported long-term uranium price indicator stood at US$96.50 per pound at the end of September 2026, although market benchmarks do not guarantee the price a project will realise.
Deep Yellow’s shares closed at A$0.82 on 16 October, compared with A$1.945 on 2 January, a decline of about 58%. The company reported cash of A$160 million at 30 June, down from A$217.4 million a year earlier. It has appointed Nedbank to arrange project debt, but a complete funding package for Tumas has yet to be finalised. Despite the postponement, work at the site has not stopped. Deep Yellow says preparatory activities are continuing, including the installation of 170 tonnes of reinforcing steel. Four service contracts worth a combined N$42.1 million have been awarded to Namibian companies, while the project’s environmental clearance has been renewed to 2029. The company’s next quarterly report was due on 22 October.
The contrast is sharper following Bannerman’s announcement on 24 September that it had completed US$320.4 million in financing with China National Nuclear Corporation (CNNC) for the Etango uranium project. Bannerman is targeting an FID by the end of 2026, although that decision has not yet been taken. Bannerman raised A$124 million through an equity placement priced at A$4 per share. Together with the CNNC financing arrangements, the funds are expected to cover Bannerman’s share of Etango’s development costs through commercial production without the need for construction debt. That provides a clearer financing pathway than the one currently available for Tumas, though construction remains conditional on the project’s formal investment decision and other approvals.
Etango’s ownership and governance structure adds complexity to the financing picture. Bannerman holds 55% of the Etango joint venture, while CNNC’s subsidiary, CNOL, holds 45%. The joint venture owns 95% of the project, with the Namibia One Economy Foundation holding the remaining 5%. On an economic-interest basis, this equates to 52.25% for Bannerman, 42.75% for CNOL and 5% for the foundation. CNOL is entitled to purchase 60% of Etango’s production at market-based prices, with Bannerman retaining the right to the remaining 40%. Bannerman has three of the five board appointments but major decisions, including the FID, require unanimous consent under the joint-venture arrangements. The structure gives CNNC a substantial commercial role while leaving key development decisions subject to joint approval.
Deep Yellow owns 100% of Tumas, although Oponona Investments may acquire a 5% interest after an FID. The different ownership structures, funding arrangements and market positions mean the projects face distinct routes to development, even as both seek to capitalise on demand for uranium.
The divergence is significant for Namibia’s uranium sector, where project execution will depend on access to capital as well as resource quality and market conditions. Bannerman’s financing milestone places Etango closer to a construction decision, but it does not mean the project has reached FID. Tumas, meanwhile, retains a substantial development resource and continues preparatory work, yet its timetable is now more exposed to equity-market conditions and the completion of its funding package.
